Are Hairdressers Considered Essential Employees?
With the ongoing pandemic and various government policies in place, the question of whether certain professions are deemed essential has become a major point of discussion. One such profession is that of the hairdresser. Going to a salon for a haircut, color, or perm is often considered a non-essential service. But why is it viewed in this light? Let's delve into the reasons behind this classification.
Why Hairdressers Aren't Considered Essential Employees
When it comes to the pandemic response, governments around the world have classified professions into essential and non-essential categories. Hairdressers are generally not categorized as essential employees. This is because haircuts, coloring, and perms are not deemed necessary for survival or public health. Health officials and government guidelines emphasize that services related to hair and beauty should be postponed until the pandemic situation stabilizes.
The Official Stand on Hairdressers
In Louisiana, for instance, hairdressers are not allowed to work and are subject to regular checks by the state board of cosmetology. Authorities are monitoring the situation closely to ensure that no hairdressers are operating illegally and posing a risk to public health.
Consequences and Reporting Mechanisms
Reporting mechanisms are in place to deter unlicensed or unregulated hair salons from operating. Individuals who have been reported are subject to fines or legal action. This stringent approach is to maintain public safety and compliance with health regulations.
Why Aren't Haircuts Considered Essential?
There are several reasons why haircuts are not categorized as essential services:
Health Risks: Hairdressers and salons often involve interactions with multiple people and the use of tools that require sanitization. These settings can potentially pose a higher risk of transmitting the virus.
Necessity: Haircuts are considered a luxury that can be postponed. Basic needs such as food, healthcare, and pharmaceutical supplies are prioritized in essential services.
Aesthetic vs. Practical: While looking good is important for many individuals, it is not a necessity for survival. People can maintain their appearance through DIY solutions or opting for longer periods without a professional haircut.
The Perspective of the Government
The U.S. government's stance on this issue reflects the broader perspective on essential services. President Trump, who is known for his own carefully styled mullet, is not under pressure to look a certain way. This example raises questions about the prioritization of appearance over public health.
Personal Solutions and DIY Methods
Many individuals have found alternative solutions to manage without a professional haircut during the pandemic:
DIY Haircuts: Partnering one household member to trim hair with clippers is a common practice. This method is simple and effective for maintaining basic hair shape.
Home Hair Coloring: Reliable hair dye kits are available for those who wish to change their hair color at home. These kits provide guidance and results similar to professional services.
Growth Option: For many, simply growing out their hair is a viable alternative until services can be safely resumed.
The Future of Hairdressers
While hairdressers may not be classified as essential employees currently, the future could see regulatory changes based on evolving public health data and safety protocols. In a more optimistic scenario, hairdressers might see a resurgence once the pandemic subsides.
Individuals have shown resilience by finding practical solutions during this time, demonstrating that health guidelines can be followed while still maintaining personal appearance. As communities continue to navigate the pandemic, the classification of non-essential services like hair cutting will continue to be a topic of debate and adjustment.