Should Elected Officials Be Paid During Forced Lockdowns That Affect Small Businesses?

During times of crisis, such as forced lockdowns, the debate around whether elected officials should continue to be paid becomes particularly relevant. The issue is often framed through the lens of fairness, but it's crucial to understand the different roles and the mechanisms in place.

Setting the Context: The Role of Elected Officials

Elected officials play a crucial role in governing and managing public resources, including the provision of aid to small businesses. They have to navigate complex legislative processes, manage public funds, and make decisions that impact communities. Providing relief to small businesses is a fundamental part of their mandate, especially in times of economic downturn.

Arguments in Favor of Paying Elected Officials

Elected officials are entitled to their pay and are indeed beneficiaries of the billions in aid allocated to small businesses. This payment is essential for their continued ability to serve the public effectively. Moreover, if these officials were not paid, they would likely work elsewhere or find other means to support themselves, potentially leading to a conflict of interest. Doubling their salaries and benefits, along with quadrupling their pension plans and banning them from lobbying for five years, could further incentivize their commitment to public service.

The Reality of Elected Officialdom

The nature of elected officials' work often involves cycling between political positions and regulatory or corporate roles. Many become insiders in the system, working as regulators, lobbyists, or in big business. This can lead to a perceived bias in favor of large corporations and away from small businesses.

Addressing the Fundament Differences Between Government and Corporate Structures

The structure and purpose of government roles differ significantly from those in the private sector. While small businesses operate on a supply-demand model to offer products or services people desire, government roles are primarily about providing essential services rather than generating profit. The heart surgeons versus plastic surgeons analogy is apt here: we need heart surgeons for their critical role, and the same applies to elected officials for their role in managing society.

Understanding the Impact of Forced Lockdowns

Despite the emphasis on the need for lockdowns, empirical evidence and personal observations suggest that many small businesses are still operating during these times. The narrative of widespread business closures, attributed to forced lockdowns, is often overblown. This mischaracterization can distract from the real issues faced by small businesses, such as access to financing, market dynamics, and regulatory hurdles.

Conclusion: Balancing Fairness and Efficiency

The debate on whether elected officials should continue to be paid during forced lockdowns should consider the broader context of their roles and responsibilities. While arguments for continuing their pay are valid, it's also crucial to address the structural and systemic issues that affect small businesses. This might involve improving public services, enhancing legislative support, and ensuring a fair balance between government and corporate interests.